3rd vs 4th generation labiaplasty
A factual comparison of how third- and fourth-generation labiaplasty are performed. Neither is 'better' for everyone; the differences are in method and follow-up.
Consultations in English · Private single-occupancy recovery suites · Insurance claim documents prepared
Incision
Third-generation techniques cut with a scalpel, scissors or radiofrequency and remove tissue by trimming the edge or excising a wedge. The fourth-generation technique used at Podo cuts with laser along the planned line.
Closure
Third-generation closure uses stitches: absorbable ones dissolve over weeks; non-absorbable ones are removed at a visit. The fourth-generation technique seals the edge without external sutures.
Follow-up visits
With external stitches there is usually a removal or check visit at one to two weeks. Without them, the check before travel focuses on healing and hygiene.
Recovery
Swelling, hygiene care and activity limits are similar for both. Healing time varies from person to person regardless of technique.
Which is right for you
Anatomy, the amount of tissue, previous surgery and your travel plans all matter. We explain at consultation what the fourth-generation technique changes for your case and what it does not.
Who performs it
Dr. Mo Hyung-jin, Medical Director
- Board-certified OB-GYN specialist
- Fellow, International Continence Society (ICS), 2016
- Author of 8 books on women's health and female aesthetic surgery
Ask us in English
Tell us what you are considering and when you could travel.
Gangnam Podo Woman Clinic
2F, 428 Gangnam-daero, Gangnam-gu, Seoul
Mon–Fri 10:00–19:00 · Sat 10:00–17:00
Sundays and public holidays